围手术期化疗与术后辅助化疗治疗局部进展期胃食管结合部腺癌疗效的研究——基于倾向性匹配分析
Perioperative chemotherapy vs. postoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a propensity score–matched analysis
投稿时间:2024-10-14  修订日期:2025-01-13
DOI:
中文关键词:  胃食管结合部腺癌  围手术期化疗  术后辅助化疗  疗效  预后
英文关键词:adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction  perioperative chemotherapy  postoperative chemotherapy  efficacy  prognosis
基金项目:浙江省 卫 生 健 康 创 新 人 才 项 目
作者单位邮编
陈航 浙江省肿瘤医院 310022
黄兴茂 浙江省肿瘤医院 
陈晗 浙江省肿瘤医院 
柴腾蛟 浙江省肿瘤医院 
王泓涛 浙江省肿瘤医院 
朱诚康 浙江省肿瘤医院 
黄灵 浙江省肿瘤医院 
俞鹏飞* 浙江省肿瘤医院 310022
蔡淑女 浙江省肿瘤医院 
摘要点击次数: 186
全文下载次数: 1
中文摘要:
      目的 探索围手术期化疗和术后辅助化疗对局部进展期胃食管结合部腺癌(adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction,AEG)患者的临床疗效及影响此类患者预后的主要因素。 方法 回顾性分析浙江省肿瘤医院胃外科2014年1月至2022年12月收治的局部进展期AEG患者的资料,分为围手术期化疗组(A组)和术后辅助化疗组(B组),通过倾向性得分匹配后,比较不同治疗方案对此类患者疗效及预后的影响。 结果 通过倾向性得分匹配后,共纳入200例患者,其中A组和B组各100例。A组和B组的3年总体生存率(overall survival,OS)分别为70.70%和72.80%(P=0.381),5年OS分别为62.70%和62.30%(P=0.362),差异不具有统计学意义。此外,在整体队列中,两组共有46例患者行纵隔淋巴结清扫,行纵隔淋巴结清扫患者,预后要好于未行纵隔淋巴结清扫患者,但差异无统计学意义(3年OS:82.70% vs 69.10%,P=0.086;5年OS:72.30% vs 61.00%,P=0.258)。多因素分析表明脉管癌栓和神经侵犯是影响局部进展期AEG患者生存的独立预后因素。 结论 相比于术后辅助化疗,围手术期化疗未能有效改善局部进展期AEG患者的总体生存率。纵膈淋巴结的清扫也没有带来生存上的获益。脉管癌栓和神经侵犯可能是影响此类患者生存的预后因素。后续需要开展更多的前瞻性研究来制定更为合理的治疗方案。
英文摘要:
      Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) and to explore the main factors influencing the prognosis of these patients. Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) treated at the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 2014 to December 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: the perioperative chemotherapy group (Group A) and the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy group (Group B). After propensity score matching, the efficacy and prognosis of different treatment regimens were compared in these patients. Results After PSM, a total of 200 patients were included, with 100 patients in each group(Group A and Group B). The 3-year OS rates of group A and group B were 70.70% and 72.80%, respectively (P=0.381), while the 5-year OS rates were 62.70% and 62.30%, respectively (P=0.362), with no statistically significant differences. In addition, among the overall cohort, a total of 46 patients in the both groups underwent mediastinal lymph node dissection. In these patients, the prognosis was better compared to those who did not undergo mediastinal lymph node dissection, but the difference was not statistically significant (3-year OS: 82.70% and 69.10%, P=0.086. 5-year OS: 72.30% and 61.00%, P=0.258). Multivariate analysis indicated that vascular embolus and nerve invasion were independent prognostic factors affecting survival of locally advanced AEG patients. Conclusion Compared topostoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, perioperative chemotherapy cannot apparently prolong the survival in patients with locally advanced AEG. Besides, there was also no survival benefit from mediastinal lymph node dissected. Vascular embolus and nerve invasion possibly were the prognostic factors that affected the survival of those patients. Further prospective studies are needed to develop more rational treatment regimens. Subject words adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction; perioperative chemotherapy; postoperative chemotherapy; efficacy; prognosis
在线阅读     查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器