| 王 莹,刘 翔,贾慧民.基于TOPSIS法的单病种多学科首席专家团队综合评价[J].中国肿瘤,2020,29(7):520-525. |
| 基于TOPSIS法的单病种多学科首席专家团队综合评价 |
| Comprehensive Evaluation of Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Based on TOPSIS Method |
| 中文关键词 修订日期：2019-11-01 |
| DOI：10.11735/j.issn.1004-0242.2020.07.A008 |
|
 |
| 中文关键词: TOPSIS法 多学科专家协作组 医院管理 |
| 英文关键词:TOPSIS method multidisciplinary team hospital management |
| 基金项目:新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2017D01C399) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1319 |
| 全文下载次数: 194 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 摘 要：［目的］应用TOPSlS(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution)法对肿瘤医院多学科专家协作组(multidisciplinary team，MDT)运行模式的发展状况进行横向的综合评价，发现各团队MDT运行模式整体发展的优劣程度，为构建MDT模式综合评价的指标体系和具体方法提供理论指导和实践支持。［方法］采用TOPSIS法从学术队伍、科学研究、医疗服务、人才培养、经济效益、社会效益6个维度，34个指标方面对医院8个肿瘤单病种多学科首席专家团队2018年的发展状况进行综合评价和分析。［结果］甲状腺癌多学科首席专家团队位列第一，肺癌多学科首席专家团队处于8个团队中的最低水平，评价结果与各团队发展现状基本相符。［结论］本研究确定的评价维度及具体评价指标，能够为管理部门对各多学科团队的统一监管、完善考核办法及多学科诊疗模式综合评价指标体系提出一些切实可行的策略建议。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Abstract：［Purpose］ To apply TOPSlS(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) method for comprehensive evaluation of cancer multidisciplinary teams. ［Methods］ The development status of 8 multidisciplinary teams for cancer was comprehensively evaluated in 2018 by TOPSIS method. Six dimensions including academic team，scientific research，medical care service，cultivation of talents，economic benefit and social benefit were involved and 34 indicators were used in evaluation. ［Results］ The multidisciplinary team of thyroid cancer ranked the first，and that of lung cancer was the last among 8 teams. The evaluation result was consistent with the development status of each team. ［Conclusion］ The evaluation dimensions and specific indicators determined in this study may provide practical strategies for the hospital management department in comprehensive supervision，improving the assessment method and constructing evaluation index system of cancer multidisciplinary teams. |
|
在线阅读
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |