| 王书亚,孙 萍,魏玫玫.聚类分析法评估肿瘤学类期刊在我国医药卫生期刊中的地位[J].中国肿瘤,2014,23(5):438-442. |
| 聚类分析法评估肿瘤学类期刊在我国医药卫生期刊中的地位 |
| Cluster Analysis for Evaluation of the Position of Oncological Journals in Chinese Medical Journals |
| 投稿时间：2014-01-21 |
| DOI：10.11735/j.issn.1004-0242.2014.05.A020 |
|
 |
| 中文关键词: 肿瘤学 医学期刊 聚类分析 期刊评价 |
| 英文关键词:oncology medical journal cluster analysis journal evaluation |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2487 |
| 全文下载次数: 883 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 摘 要：［目的］ 探讨肿瘤学类期刊在我国医药卫生期刊中的地位。［方法］ 利用《2012年版中国科技期刊引证报告（扩刊版）》收录的1026种医药卫生类期刊的18项期刊评价指标数据，对18类医药卫生期刊进行聚类分析。［结果］ 聚类分析结果显示，18类医药卫生期刊可以分为4类，肿瘤学类期刊处于第三方阵。根据9项被引指标和9项来源指标进行的聚类分析结果显示，18类医药卫生期刊均可以分为3类，肿瘤学类期刊的被引情况和来源情况均位居第三方阵。［结论］ 我国肿瘤学类期刊总体状况不是太理想，还需要各期刊继续努力。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Abstract：［Purpose］ To investigate the position of oncological journals in Chinese medical journals. ［Methods］ On the basis of 《Chinese Journal Citation Reports (2012 expanded edition)》，which included 1026 medical journals with 18 journals evaluation index data. Cluster analysis was performed on 18 types of medical journals.［Results］ Eighteen types of medical journals were divided into 4 categories，and oncological journals were in the third array. According to 9 cited indexes and 9 source indexes，cluster analysis revealed that 18 types of medical journals were divided into 3 categories，both cited and source data of oncological journals ranked in the third array. ［Conclusion］ Overall condition of Chinese oncological journals seems not ideal，the editors should keep working hard continually. |
|
在线阅读
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |