基于真实世界数据驱动的2598例食管癌患者术后多维度生存分析
A Real-World Data-Driven Multidimensional Survival Analysis of 2,598 Patients Undergoing Surgery for Esophageal Cancer
投稿时间:2025-09-16  修订日期:2025-11-27
DOI:
中文关键词:  食管癌  手术  总生存率  生存随访  医院登记  
英文关键词:Esophageal cancer  Surgery  Overall survival rate  Survival follow-up  Hospital registration
基金项目:
作者单位邮编
褚嘉栋 浙江省肿瘤医院 310022
楼丽姝 浙江省肿瘤医院 310022
王长春 浙江省肿瘤医院 310022
单英华 浙江省肿瘤医院 310022
阮燕萍* 浙江省肿瘤医院 310022
摘要点击次数: 22
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      背景与目的:评估基于医院登记的接受手术治疗食管癌患者的长期随访资料,为食管癌术后生存状况提供最新的真实世界证据。方法:研究纳入2015年1月1日-2021年12月31日于浙江省肿瘤医院确诊食管癌并接受根治性手术治疗的患者共2598例,收集患者基本信息、临床及随访生存资料,随访时间统计截至2024年11月19日。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计术后1、3、5年总生存(overall survival,OS)率,并通过Log-rank检验比较不同年龄、性别、手术方式、病理分期等亚组的生存差异。结果:经中位随访5.18年后,食管癌患者总体术后1年、3年和5年OS率分别为87.02%、64.14%和55.55%。0~Ⅳ期食管癌手术患者5年OS率分别为94.44%、75.22%、62.94%、38.05%和12.72%。不同性别、年龄、手术年份、手术切口、手术方式、分化程度、组织学分型及进展期大体分型的生存差异显著。结论:本研究首次报告浙江省内以医院登记为基础的大样本食管癌患者术后长期生存结果,为评估食管癌诊疗水平提供真实世界数据支持。
英文摘要:
      Background and Objective: To evaluate the long-term follow-up data of esophageal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment based on hospital registration, and provide the latest real-world evidence for the postoperative survival status of esophageal cancer. Methods: The study included 2,598 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer who underwent radical surgical treatment at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. Basic patient information, clinical characteristics and follow-up survival data were collected. Follow-up data were collected through November 19, 2024. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after surgery. The Log-rank test was used to compare the survival differences across subgroups including age, sex, surgical approach, pathological stage and so on. Results: After a median follow-up of 5.18 years, the overall 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS rates of esophageal cancer patients after surgery were 87.02%, 64.14% and 55.55% respectively. The 5-year OS rates of surgical patients with stage 0-Ⅳ esophageal cancer were 94.44%, 75.22%, 62.94%, 38.05% and 12.72% respectively. Statistically significant survival differences were observed across subgroups stratified by sex, age, surgical year, incision type, surgical approach, differentiation grade, histologic subtype, and advanced-stage gross classification. Conclusion: This study firstly reported the long-term postoperative survival outcomes of esophageal cancer patients in a large, hospital registry-based sample from Zhejiang Province, which provides real-world evidence for evaluating the quality of cancer diagnosis and treatment.
在线阅读     查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器